This analysis explores the impact of three learning methods on enhancing analytical skills in higher education, suggesting positive outcomes.
Introduction: The study investigated the influence of research-oriented learning methods—Project-Based Learning (PBL), Laboratory-Based Learning (LBL), and STEM-Based Learning (SBL)—on the development of analytical skills (AS) among higher education students.Methods: A total of 331 students were selected through persuasive sampling. Data were collected using a self-developed MBAS questionnaire (Appendix-1). The instrument’s reliability was confirmed (Cronbach’s α = 0.933). Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (correlation analysis) were employed.Results: PBL emerged as the most preferred approach (M = 3.8731, SD = 0.84314), attributed to its interactive nature. SBL exhibited the strongest correlation with assessment scores (r = .781, p < .001). All observed correlations between PBL, LBL, SBL, and AS were statistically significant at the 0.01 level, confirming robust positive relationships among these pedagogical strategies and analytical skill development.Conclusions: The findings support the integration of structured research activities, particularly SBL, into academic curricula to enhance analytical thinking. These approaches offer effective pathways for promoting higher-order cognitive competencies in higher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perminova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: