Methodical creation enhances skills in new pedagogical technology for future mathematics teachers, indicating improved teaching methods.
The article presents the author's methodical creation on the formation of students – future mathematics teachers' skills to apply one of the new pedagogical technologies - Scaffolding technology in mathematics lessons, in particular in profiled classes of secondary education institutions. First of all, the author draws the reader's attention to the essence of this technology and the feasibility of its use in mathematics lessons. Therefore, the problem of preparing future mathematics teachers for the implementation of this educational technology, adherence to the basic principles of its application, and forming students' skills to adequately select a system of mathematical problems to achieve the set goal becomes relevant. The author presents in detail the sequence of implementation of all stages of the Scaffolding technology on the example of teaching schoolchildren to use the method of inputting an auxiliary parameter when solving planimetric problems of a high level of complexity. It is demonstrated what problematic issues should be discussed with applicants for higher pedagogical education in order for them to understand the essence of the Scaffolding technology and the skills to effectively apply it. The presented methodical creation was tested at an open practical lesson on the course "Methodology of Teaching Mathematics" for students of the specialty "teacher of mathematics and English" (course lessons for these applicants are conducted in English). The implementation of the methodical development received favorable reviews from colleagues in the Department of Mathematics and Methods of Teaching Mathematics, as well as positive feedback from students who noted the usefulness of the work carried out for professional development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Катерина Нєдялкова (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: