PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 2025Environmental Science & Technology14 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the Policy Gaps for Achieving China’s Carbon Neutrality Target

View Full Paper
ZFZhang FangKGKelly Sims GallagherMDMing Deng

Key Points

  • China's 1+N policy package aims for carbon dioxide peaking and greenhouse gas neutrality but lacks full effectiveness.
  • Important metrics reveal stringency and coverage gaps hinder comprehensive GHG neutrality across sectors.
  • Utilizing a mixed methods approach, the study combined policy inventory, expert survey, and system dynamics modeling.
  • Addressing policy gaps can significantly improve the effectiveness of China’s climate strategies moving forward.

Abstract

The global commitment to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions requires reform of existing policies, the formulation of new policies, and concrete policy implementation in every country. This paper provides an early effort to examine the overall readiness of China's 1+N climate policy package to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060 and to explore policy gaps. We use a mixed methods approach, combining a comprehensive policy inventory, an expert survey, and a system dynamics model to analyze the adequacy of China's climate policies. Our findings reveal that China's 1+N policy package will enable near-term carbon dioxide peaking and ultimately shift China toward full greenhouse gas (GHG) neutrality. However, the 1+N policies fall short of achieving full GHG neutrality across the whole economy due to a lack of stringency in some existing policies (i.e., stringency gaps) and some neglected sectors and areas in which policies are missing (i.e., coverage policy gaps). Meanwhile, the expert survey reveals concerns about implementation that exist for almost all policies (i.e., implementation gaps). We further discuss implications for how China could improve its 1+N policy package.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4766ad7bf08b1ead4967https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c12478
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper