Study examined immunogenicity and safety of co-administering COVID-19 mRNA and influenza vaccines in adults, indicating effective vaccination enhancement.
Co-administering vaccines can effectively enhance vaccination uptake in adults. Despite the potential benefits, there is limited data supporting this practice. We investigated the immunogenicity and safety of co-administering COVID-19 mRNA, Influenza, and Pneumococcal (PPSV23) vaccines in adults. As part of the national vaccination program, 3,104 adults received a fourth dose (2nd booster) of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine alone or coadministered with an influenza vaccine, with or without PPSV23 from January to December 2022. We measured SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike and anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG concentrations and neutralization activity before and one month after vaccination. We estimated the odds of a ≥2-fold geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) and adverse events (AEs) using logistic regression models. The median age of the 3,104 participants was 70 years (IQR: 60-77); 1,670 (54%) were female. Anti-spike IgG GMFRs were 1.95, 1.56, and 1.42, while for neutralization activity, values were 8.99, 12.42, and 8.23, in the COVID-19, COVID-19+Influenza, and COVID-19+Influenza+PPSV23 groups, respectively. The adjusted odds of a ≥2-fold anti-spike IgG GMFR were 0.64 (p < 0.001) and 0.43 (p < 0.001), and for neutralization activity, 0.96 (p = 0.833) and 0.97 (p = 0.954), for COVID-19+Influenza and COVID-19+Influenza+PPSV23, respectively. The odds for anti-RBD GMFRs followed similar patterns. Systemic AEs were more common in the COVID-19+Influenza+PPSV23 group (adjusted OR: 2.04, p < 0.001), though no serious AEs were reported. Co-administering COVID-19, Influenza, and PPSV23 vaccines seems feasible, without significantly impairing neutralizing antibody responses. These findings support the recommendation for vaccine coadministration in adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rezahosseini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: