This research proposes a reverse logistics system for end-of-life batteries, highlighting costs and facility placements in Jakarta's urban ecosystem.
The rapid growth of electric vehicles (EVs) in the Jakarta Greater Area is expected to significantly increase the volume of end-of-life (EoL) batteries, necessitating an efficient and sustainable waste management system. This study designs a reverse logistics network that includes Collection Centers (CCs), a combined Remanufacturing and Recycling Center (RMC), and a Waste Disposal Center (WDC). Dealer clusters are identified using K-means clustering to determine the optimal CC locations. A deterministic mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model is developed to minimize total costs. It comprises acquisition, transportation, processing, facility, and carbon tax components. The model yields a minimum total cost of IDR 1,236,435,000,187, with processing costs contributing the largest share (56.68%), followed by transportation (29.30%). The selected facilities include five CCs (CCA-1, CCE-2, CCK-3, CCM-4, and CCR-5), one RMC (RMC-1), and one WDC (WDC-1). Based on battery health, the batteries are classified into three categories: L1 (>80% health, suitable for remanufacturing), L2 (60–80%, suitable for recycling), and L3 (<60%, directed to disposal). L1 and L2 batteries are directed to RMC-1, while L3 batteries and solid waste are routed to WDC-1, totaling 1.029 tons. The results emphasize the need for improving processing efficiency and strategic facility placement to enhance the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of EoL battery management in urban EV ecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bafadal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: