Exploratory mixed-methods research reveals factors impacting trade union participation among public servants, highlighting challenges in collective bargaining.
This study examines the determinants affecting Malaysian public officials' choices to join or decline trade union membership, emphasizing both behavioral and economic aspects. Notwithstanding legal safeguards provided by the Trade Union Act 1959, union engagement in the public sector remains minimal, prompting apprehensions regarding labor representation and the efficacy of collective bargaining. This research used a sequential exploratory mixed-methods methodology, grounded in social exchange theory and enhanced by labor economics perspectives. The qualitative phase comprised focus group discussions with both union and non-union members, and the quantitative phase involved a poll of 1,382 civil servants throughout Malaysia. Research indicates that leadership credibility and concrete welfare advantages are the primary factors influencing union adoption, but perceived inefficiency and the lack of visibility of benefits substantially hinder involvement. Regression models reveal that union leadership and employer influence are the most significant drivers of membership ambitions. The rejection model accounts for only a small portion of the variance, indicating the presence of more profound structural or perceptual challenges. The research underscores the necessity for transparent financial governance, aggressive recruitment techniques, and enhanced institutional coordination to rejuvenate union significance. These ideas possess practical qualifications for trade union leaders and policymakers in improving public sector labor relations via organizational and fiscal reforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: