Audit assesses group and saves and intra-abdominal drains in appendicectomies, suggesting improved cost-effectiveness.
Aims Appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency, with approximately 50,000 cases annually in the UK. No national guidance exists regarding routine group and saves (G&S) for emergency laparoscopic surgery. Intraoperative major vessel injury for appendicectomies is rare (0.07-0.12%). World Society of Emergency Surgery Guidelines (WSES) advise complicated appendectomies require drains after consultant discussion if aged >16. This audit aimed to evaluate G&S and drain insertion for emergency appendicectomies against WSES guidelines. Methods Retrospective data was collected between June 2023 – December 2023, identifying 222 patients and analysed using SPSS. Results 72.5% had G&S costing a total of £9340.48. 0 patients required a blood transfusion. All drain decisions were trainee led. Median age of complicated appendicectomies with drains (56 out of 97 patients) was 45.5 (range 7-83). Median age of complicated perforated appendicectomies with drains (46 out of 62 patients) was 43.6 (range 7-83). Perforated appendicectomies with drains (n=46) were found to be statistically significant (P-value 0.000013). For complicated appendicitis, no statistical difference was found between post-operative complications with or without drains (post-operative pneumonia P-value 0.72, post-operative atelectasis P-value 0.72, post-operative collection P-value 0.72 and wound infection P-value 0.41). Length of stay (LOS) was higher in complicated appendicectomies with drains (median LOS 4 days, P-value 0.43). Conclusions This audit highlighted safe practice with no clinical indication of G&S for emergency appendicectomies, driving a significant clinical impact in changing trust guidelines to improve cost-effectiveness. Judicious assessment and universal consensus is needed on the appropriate use of drains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manku et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: