Observational analysis shows high-fat diet increases ischemic vulnerability in mouse models, suggesting metabolic alterations are key.
Previous work has shown that mouse models fed a non-obesogenic high-fat diet have preserved cardiac function and no obesity-associated comorbidities such as diabetes. However, they do suffer increased cardiac vulnerability to ischemic reperfusion (I/R) injury, which has been attributed to changes in Ca2+ handling, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial transition pore activity. However, there have been no studies investigating the involvement of metabolites. Wild-type mice were fed either a control or a non-obesogenic high-fat diet for ~26 weeks. Key cardiac metabolites were extracted from freshly excised hearts and from hearts exposed to 30 min global ischemia followed by 45 min reperfusion. The extracted metabolites were measured using commercially available kits and HPLC. Hemodynamic cardiac function was monitored in Langendorff perfused hearts. Levels of energy-rich phosphates and related metabolites were similar for both hearts fed a control or a high-fat diet. However, the high-fat diet decreased cardiac glycogen and increased cardiac lactate, hypoxanthine, alanine, and taurine levels. Langendorff perfused hearts from the high-fat diet group suffered more ischemic stress during ischemia, as shown by the significantly shorter time needed for onset and for reaching maximal ischemic (rigor) contracture. Following I/R, there was a significant decrease in myocardial adenine nucleotides and a significant increase in the levels of alanine and purines for both groups. Most of the principal amino acids tended to fall during I/R. Hearts from mice fed a high-fat diet showed more changes during I/R in markers of energetics (phosphorylation potential and energy charge), metabolic stress (lactate), and osmotic stress (taurine). This study suggests that cardiac metabolic changes due to high-fat diet feeding, independent of obesity-related comorbidities, are responsible for the marked metabolic changes and the increased vulnerability to I/R.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hawi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: