This analysis compares foreign aid approaches of China and Qatar in MENA-17, highlighting motivations and strategies.
This study provides a comprehensive empirical analysis of the foreign aid policies of two prominent non-Western donors, China and Qatar, with a particular focus on the Middle East and North Africa (MENA-17) region from 2014–2021. Utilizing Heckman Poisson selection models and unique datasets—AidData for China and QATARAID for Qatar—the research compares their distinct motivations, aid modalities, and geographical priorities. Findings reveal a stark contrast between their approaches. Qatar’s aid strategy is overwhelmingly concentrated within MENA-17, driven primarily by humanitarian concerns, recipient need, and diplomatic leveraging for regional stability, with negligible influence from commercial interests. In contrast, China’s aid exhibits a more globally diversified portfolio, deeply rooted in economic statecraft and broader geopolitical objectives. Chinese aid is strongly correlated with its commercial interests, particularly exports, and aims to foster political alignment, emphasizing infrastructure development, trade facilitation, and long-term economic engagement. This comparative analysis significantly contributes to understanding the evolving global aid architecture and the diverse strategic roles played by emerging donors, unmasking the heterogeneous nature of non-Western aid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fazlıoğlu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: