Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 5, 2025European Journal of Risk RegulationOpen Access

Solar Geoengineering Governance: A Fragmented Institutional Landscape Covering Multi-Dimensional Impacts

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DRDana RuddigkeitHBH. BrugginkAGAarti Gupta

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analyzing governance frameworks for solar radiation modification impacts, highlighting gaps and regulatory complexities.

Key Points

  • Governance of solar geoengineering reveals a fragmented institutional framework, complicating effective regulation.
  • The analysis indicates a nuanced understanding of existing international law obligations related to SRM technologies.
  • It highlights that while there are diverse impacts, global coordination for SRM governance remains limited.
  • The current institutional landscape allows for restrictive measures to mitigate adverse effects associated with SRM.

Cite This Study

Ruddigkeit et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68bb49c46d6d5674bccff85chttps://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.10048
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Challenges and opportunities of solar geoengineering for climate governance2026
  2. 2Towards a Non-Use Regime on Solar Geoengineering: Lessons from International Law and Governance2024 · 17 citations
  3. 3Solar geoengineering: The case for an international non‐use agreement2022 · 241 citations
  4. 4Ideological divides around solar radiation modification geoengineering2026
  5. 5Why oppose solar geoengineering? Mapping and comparing underlying rationales across actor groups2026 · 2 citations