Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis reveals PSA rise over 2 ng/mL does not always imply recurrence in prostate cancer, suggesting the Phoenix criteria may need reconsideration.
Background: Biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy for prostate cancer is commonly defined by the Phoenix criteria (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] nadir + 2 ng/mL). However, some patients experience PSA elevation without clinical recurrence, which is known as PSA bounce. This study aimed to evaluate PSA kinetics after scanning-method carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PCa) and to assess the clinical validity of the Phoenix criteria. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 171 patients with HR-PCa who underwent CIRT and 2 years of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were classified into three groups based on post-treatment PSA kinetics: non-recurrence, pseudo-recurrence (PR; PSA > 2 ng/mL followed by spontaneous decline without salvage therapy), and recurrence (R; PSA > 2 ng/mL with salvage therapy). PSA bounce was defined as a transient PSA increase > 0.4 ng/mL followed by spontaneous decline. Kaplan–Meier and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to evaluate biochemical relapse-free survival and determine the optimal PSA cutoff. Results: Among 171 patients, 18 (10.5%) met the Phoenix criteria (R+PR), of whom 6 (33.3%) experienced spontaneous PSA decline. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival rate was 90.0%. PSA bounce occurred in 33.9%. ROC analysis identified an optimal PSA cutoff of 1.91 ng/mL (area under the curve: 0.985), whereas the positive predictive value at the 2 ng/mL cutoff was as low as 61.1% due to the influence of PSA bounce. Conclusions: After CIRT, a PSA rise of >2 ng/mL does not always indicate HR-PCa recurrence and should be interpreted with caution to avoid overtreatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shima et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: