Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative case study explores self-reported implementation of high-leverage practices in K-12 world language classrooms, suggesting key insights for teacher development.
Research on the implementation of high‐leverage practices (HLTPs) in World Languages (WL) has gained momentum over the past decade. While the field has largely focused its attention on HLTPs in preservice teacher preparation, our research seeks to illuminate how in‐service WL teachers self‐report utilizing the HLTPs in classroom instruction. This qualitative case study examined the self‐reported teaching practices of 54 in‐service K‐12 WL teachers in the U.S. Data were collected through a survey and a follow‐up semi‐structured interview with nine of the 54 participants. Our analysis focused on two of Glisan and Donato's (2017) HLTPs, Facilitating Target Language Comprehensibility (HLTP #1) and Building a Classroom Discourse Community (HLTP #2). The findings revealed that the majority of participants self‐reported what could be considered “effective” implementation of HLTPs #1 and #2, while a number of participants indicated “developing” or “ineffective” micro‐practices associated with HLTPs more broadly. The implications of this study may inform both the work of teacher development programming for in‐service teachers and research on HLTPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borden et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: