Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study compares the effects of space allowance on carcass traits and meat quality in pigs across indoor conventional and organic systems.
Consumer demand for high-quality products, combined with expectations for more sustainable production systems and animal welfare, is driving major changes in livestock farming practices. It is known that space allowance plays a central role in pig welfare, promoting resting and reducing the incidence of injuries and stress-related behaviors; however, there is little scientific evidence on the effect that available space has on the carcass and meat quality. In this study, space allowances were compared, in both an indoor conventional system (1.15, 1.9 and 3 m2/pig) and an indoor organic system with outdoor access (1.4 + 1, 2.6 + 2 and 3.9 + 3 m2/pig). The increase in space available for pigs had no effect on pig performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics, such as pH, drip and cooking loss. However, lowering stocking density in the conventional indoor housing system improved meat tenderness, as assessed by the Slice Shear Force test, while no difference was found between meat tenderness in organic pigs raised with three different stocking densities. Increased space allowance per pig reduced n-3 fatty acids in pig loins from both housing systems and n-6 fatty acids and PUFAs in loins from pigs reared in the organic housing system with both indoor and outdoor space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: