Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This observational study assesses ctDNA's diagnostic value in M1a lung cancer, highlighting its limitations and potential for monitoring CEA.
Objectives: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a reliable prognostic biomarker in both early- and late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, its role in NSCLC with pleural dissemination (M1a), a subset of disease with indolent biology, remains to be elucidated. Methods: We collected 41 M1a patients with serial ctDNA and CEA monitoring. Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed between patients with different levels of ctDNA and CEA. An independent cohort of 61 M1a patients was included for validation. Results: At the diagnostic landmark, the detection rates for ctDNA and CEA were 22% and 55%, respectively. Among patients who experienced disease progression with pleural metastases, only ten had detectable ctDNA in longitudinal timepoints, resulting in a sensitivity of 50%. Moreover, there was no significant difference in PFS between patients with longitudinally detectable and undetectable ctDNA (HR: 0.86, 95% CI 0.33–2.23, p = 0.76). In contrast, patients with a decreasing CEA trend within 3 months after diagnosis were associated with an improved PFS (HR: 0.22; 95% CI, 0.03–1.48, p = 0.004). This finding is confirmed in an independent M1a patient cohort. Conclusions: Together, our findings suggest that M1a NSCLC with isolated pleural dissemination may represent a “non-shedding” tumor type, where ctDNA shows limited diagnostic and prognostic value. Monitoring early changes in CEA could be a more cost-effective predictor of disease progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: