Prospective ICU cohort study evaluates serum biomarkers predicting acute kidney injury, suggesting SDC1's utility.
Background and Aims: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI) is common and is associated with poor outcomes. This prospective observational study aimed to assess the predictive value of four novel biomarkers—syndecan-1 (SDC1), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), proenkephalin (PENK), and presepsin (PSPN)—for renal outcomes and mortality in septic ICU patients. Methods: Serum biomarker levels were measured in serum samples collected at the time of sepsis diagnosis on the basis of the Sepsis-3 criteria. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, and patients were grouped by the presence of AKI, renal replacement therapy requirement (RRT), and intensive care unit (ICU) survival. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and severity score data were compared between groups to evaluate the predictive performance of biomarkers and clinical parameters. Results: Of the 140 septic patients included, 55.0% developed AKI, 17.2% required RRT, and the ICU mortality rate was 50.0%. SDC1 was independently associated with both AKI (OR: 1.201; p = 0.024) and RRT initiation (OR: 1.260; p = 0.004). It also demonstrated the highest predictive performance for RRT (AUC: 0.715; p = 0.001) and a significant AUC for AKI evaluation (AUC: 0.659; p = 0.002). NGAL levels were significantly elevated in patients with AKI and higher SOFA scores but were not independently predictive. PENK and PSPN were not significantly associated with any renal outcome or mortality. The combined SOFA–SDC1 model improved discrimination for both AKI (AUC: 0.770) and RRT (AUC: 0.737), surpassing individual predictors. Conclusions: SDC1 emerged as the most reliable biomarker for assessing AKI and predicting the need for RRT, highlighting its potential role in early renal risk stratification among critically ill patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canbaz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: