Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 10, 2025Translational Cancer ResearchOpen Access

Survival outcomes of local versus radical resection for appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RXRen XiaFGFang GaoGWGanhong Wang

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Population-based analysis highlights no survival advantage of radical resection for appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors, suggesting local resection may be sufficient.

Key Points

  • Patients undergoing local resection had a significantly better 5-year overall survival than those undergoing radical resection.
  • Multivariate Cox analysis showed that surgical modality was not an independent prognostic factor for survival outcomes.
  • Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes while minimizing selection bias between surgical groups.
  • The Kaplan-Meier method revealed significant differences in cancer-specific survival between local and radical resection.

Cite This Study

Xia et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1a25354b1d3bfb60dce2dhttps://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2025-23
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share