Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares survival after right hemicolectomy versus appendectomy for appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors, suggesting appendectomy may suffice.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: NCCN guidelines recommend right hemicolectomy (RHC) for appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (aNETs) > 2 cm and observation for < 1 cm. However, optimal surgical management of 1-2 cm tumors remains controversial. This study compared long-term survival and recurrence between patients undergoing RHC versus appendectomy (APY) for 1-2 cm aNETs. METHODS: Patients with pathologically confirmed 1-2 cm aNETs treated at three Mayo Clinic sites (1972-2024) were included. Primary outcomes were recurrence and all-cause mortality after resection. Associations with lymph node (LN) metastasis were assessed in patients with lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were identified: 29 (45%) underwent APY, 35 (54%) RHC, and one ileocecectomy. Median age at diagnosis was 39 years; 71% were female and 94% white. LN positivity was 15.2% for tumors with nodes examined. Tumor size > 1.5 cm, stage T3/T4, and lymphovascular invasion were not associated with nodal metastasis. No survival differences were observed between APY and RHC. LN positivity did not impact survival. No recurrences occurred during a median follow-up of 6.25 years (IQR 2.44-12.63). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with 1-2 cm aNETs, RHC conferred no survival benefit over APY. Absence of recurrence and the limited prognostic value of nodal disease suggest APY alone may suffice for this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: