Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative study explores basic and non-basic clauses with dummy subject man in Thai, suggesting functional relationships.
The investigation of the dummy subject man, a non-referential pronoun in Thai, has historically received limited scholarly attention, and therefore, lacks a comprehensive analysis encompassing its diverse forms, structures, functions, and their interrelation. This article aims to explore the clausal constructions and the form-function mappings associated with the dummy subject man in Thai. Employing a qualitative approach, this study analyzes a variety of data extracted from contemporary informal and colloquial written narratives. The analysis was conducted within the framework of functional-typological grammar, which elucidates the interaction between grammatical structures and communicative functions. The findings reveal that the dummy subject man occurs across a range of constructions, encompassing both basic and non-basic clause types. Basic clauses exhibit both simple and complex structural patterns. Simple clauses feature intransitive, transitive, and copular verbs. Complex basic clauses manifest as extrapositional pronoun structures. Non-basic clauses include existential-presentational, topic-comment, and cleft constructions. Functionally, basic clauses express lexical-semantic features pertaining to environmental or meteorological phenomena, physical or mental states, activities or actions, spatial distances or related implications, temporal references, and epistemic-valuative-difficulty assessments. Non-basic clauses fulfill discourse-pragmatic functions within two primary domains: information structuring and pragmatic emphasis, such as topic introduction, topic reintroduction, and the presentation of contradictory beliefs. The results of this study not only identify a broader array of structures and functions compared to previous research but also offer a more comprehensive description of clausal constructions featuring the dummy subject man, thereby contributing to a more nuanced understanding of this linguistic phenomenon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Unchalee Singnoi Wongwattana (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: