Randomized trial assesses analgesic and hemodynamic effects of ketorolac and lignocaine in patients, suggesting both are equally effective.
Background: Pain on injection of propofol is a common and uncomfortable experience during the induction of general anesthesia, often affecting patient satisfaction and comfort. Various pharmacological agents have been explored to reduce this pain, including lignocaine, a local anesthetic, and ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. This study was designed to assess and compare the analgesic and hemodynamic effects of ketorolac versus lignocaine in minimizing propofol-induced pain during general anesthesia induction. Methods: This randomized comparative study was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesia, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, over six months (July 1 to December 31, 2021). A total of 200 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled after obtaining ethical approval and informed consent. Participants were randomized into two groups: Group A received ketorolac and Group B received lignocaine before propofol injection. Pain scores and hemodynamic responses were recorded and analyzed using SPSS version 21. Results: The mean age of patients in Group A (ketorolac) was 37.19 ± 8.39 years, and in Group B (lignocaine) was 37.83 ± 8.85 years. The sample included 33.5% males and 66.5% females. Pre-anesthetic pain scores were 2.37 in the ketorolac group and 2.44 in the lignocaine group (p = 0.355). After propofol administration, both groups showed a mean pain score of 0.883 (p = 1.00), indicating no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Ketorolac and lignocaine were equally effective in reducing pain associated with propofol injection, with no significant difference in their analgesic or hemodynamic effects during anesthesia induction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chouhdary et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: