Transdiagnostic randomized controlled trial assesses HIIT's impact on anxiety and depression symptoms in PD and MS, suggesting effective exercise therapy options.
Background/Objectives: Parkinson’s disease (PD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are neurological conditions that result in debilitating non-motor symptoms, such as anxiety and depression, which significantly reduce quality of life and often persist despite pharmacological treatment. As a result, effective alternative treatment strategies are needed. Exercise therapy—particularly aerobic training—has shown promise in alleviating non-motor symptoms, potentially through neuroplastic adaptations. However, traditional aerobic exercise is often time-consuming and monotonous, limiting long-term adherence. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) offers a time-efficient and potentially more engaging alternative, though its effects on non-motor symptoms in PD and MS remain understudied. Methods: This transdiagnostic randomized controlled trial will enroll 48 participants (24 PD, 24 MS) with clinically significant affective symptoms (hospital anxiety and depression scale [HADS] ≥ 8). The participants will be randomly assigned to one of three 8-week interventions: (1) HIIT, 5–6 intervals of 45 s of high-intensity cycling; (2) continuous aerobic training (CAT), 50 min of low-intensity cycling; (3) movement advice (MA), step goals, and physical education. The primary (affective symptoms) and secondary outcomes (cognition, fatigue, sleep, motor function) will be assessed at four time points: 4 and 1 weeks pre intervention, and 1 and 4 weeks post intervention. Weekly blood samples and pre/post brain imaging will be collected to study biofluid and MRI measures for potential neuroplasticity. Linear mixed models will analyze the time and group effects. Discussion: This trial will assess whether HIIT can more effectively improve non-motor and motor symptoms in PD and MS than CAT or MA. A multimodal approach will explore both the clinical outcomes and underlying mechanisms, informing scalable and engaging rehabilitation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gravesteijn et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: