Experimental analysis shows laser energy and impact cycles affect deformation behavior in carbon steel, suggesting improved forming capacity.
A systematic investigation was conducted on the laser shock forming (LSF) process of carbon steel Q355ME sheets and practical skin components, focusing on the influence of absorption layer types, laser energy, and impact cycles on forming capacity and surface properties. Three kinds of absorbing layers were compared in the experiment: no absorbing layer, 0.1 mm aluminum foil and 0.12 mm black tape. The results show that when the black tape is used as the absorbing layer, the forming effect is the best, the arc height value reaches 2.63 mm, and the radius of curvature is 1066 mm. Using 0.1 mm thick black tape as the absorption layer and laser parameters of 10% overlap rate, 15 ns pulse width, 4 mm spot, and 1064 nm wavelength, the single impact of 13 J, 15 J, and 17 J, and one, two, and three impacts of 15 J energy were carried out on the plate. It was found that the increase in laser energy and impact times resulted in increases in deformation, surface roughness, microhardness, and residual stress of the plate. The surface work hardening phenomenon of Q355ME plate after laser shock slowed down the increase in these performance parameters. The experimental results show that the laser energy is linearly positively correlated with the residual stress in a certain energy range. Under the optimized laser process parameters, the forming error of the actual skin parts is controlled within ± 0.4 mm, the surface residual stress increases by 368.9%, and the surface microhardness increases by 10.4%. The ultra-high strain plastic deformation and grain refinement on the surface of the sheet were caused by multiple laser shock peenings, which confirmed that LSF technology can improve the formability of carbon steel skin parts and improve its surface properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: