Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 16, 2025Media Pendidikan MatematikaOpen Access

Analisis Kemampuan Pembuktian Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Phytagoras Ditinjau dari Resiliensi dan Gaya Kognitif Siswa

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ASAbadihon Fazli SiraitAMAbdul MujibSyarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Qualitative analysis reveals resilience and cognitive style impact students' proof abilities in mathematics.

Key Points

  • Students with high resilience and field-independent cognitive styles excel in mathematical proof skills, showcasing logical argumentation.
  • Moderate resilience coupled with field-dependent cognitive styles leads to adequate proof abilities but requires additional guidance.
  • Low resilience and field-dependent cognitive styles correlate with poor proof skills, confusion, and a tendency to give up easily.
  • The findings emphasize the need for educators to consider both cognitive and affective factors to enhance students' mathematical thinking.

Cite This Study

Sirait et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4565b31b076d99fa5b21dhttps://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v13i1.16240
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Students' mathematical literacy ability to solve problems using matrix material is viewed from cognitive styles.2024
  2. 2MATHEMATICAL LITERACY ABILITY OF STUDENTS FROM A COGNITIVE STYLE PERSPECTIVE ON RATIONAL NUMBERS2024
  3. 3Critical Mathematical Thinking Ability Viewed from The Mathematical Disposition of Junior High School Students2026
  4. 4Critical thinking profile of junior high school students in solving function problems as seen in the face of mathematical ability2025
  5. 5Enhancing critical thinking with realistic mathematics education: Insight from learning styles, thinking habits, and cognitive abilities2025