Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 17, 2025

Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Flood Assessment and Management: Systematic Literature Review for the Period 2014–2024

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DBDarko BožanićDTDuško TešićAPAdis Puška

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Literature review identifies trends in multi-criteria decision-making for flood assessment, highlighting varied methods and the rise of hybrid models.

Key Points

  • Analysis reveals the rise of hybrid models combining MCDM with statistical methods and machine learning.
  • Research highlights the global nature of contributions, particularly notable from Asia in flood management literature.
  • Several critical areas like vulnerability assessment are focal points, indicating diverse applications of MCDM methods.
  • Calls for improved transparency and standardization to enhance MCDM's effectiveness in risk management.

Cite This Study

Božanić et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4566c31b076d99fa5bb67https://doi.org/10.70995/suts8756
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multidimensional assessment of urban water security under post-disaster and environmental stress conditions2026
  2. 2Flood Management on GIS-Based Multicriteria Evaluation in Developing Countries : A Systematic Literature Review2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3A systematic literature review on GIS and MCDA based flood risk management determinants in developing countries2026
  4. 4Using multi‐criteria decision‐making methods in prioritizing structural flood control solutions: A case study from Iran2024 · 13 citations
  5. 5A structured review and critical synthesis of multi-criteria decision-making models integrated with machine learning for water resource management2026