Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic literature review assesses water security in urban areas, suggesting improvements for resilient strategies.
Urban water security has become a key component of sustainable development, especially in regions affected by hydrological uncertainty and socio-environmental vulnerability. This study conducts a systematic literature review combined with a global bibliometric analysis to map and evaluate the evolution of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) models applied to water security assessment. A total of 112 peer-reviewed articles published between 2001 and 2024 were retrieved from major scientific databases. The analysis integrates bibliometric and content-based approaches to identify research trends, thematic clusters, and methodological advances linking MCDA and geospatial tools in water management. Results highlight the predominance of studies from Asia (38%) and the frequent application of AHP, PROMETHEE, and fuzzy methods integrated with GIS. Eight thematic domains were identified: groundwater, water quality, water resources management, indicators, water supply, climate change, allocation, and risk reduction. Despite progress, gaps remain in integrating hydrological, socio-economic, resilience, and governance dimensions, particularly in post-disaster urban contexts. By consolidating fragmented knowledge, this study offers strategic insights and a conceptual foundation for applying geospatial multicriteria models to public policy, supporting adaptive, resilience-oriented strategies for equitable and sustainable urban water management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apolinário et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: