Comparison of fitting models shows improved precision in T2 and T2 quantification in GE-SE EPIK data, suggesting the need for noise consideration.
Motivation: Imperfect refocusing pulses and imaging noise hinder the quantification performance of simultaneous T2 and T2* fitting approaches and require specific correction methods. Goal(s): Improve fitting results using a combination of slice profile correction terms and sophisticated fitting models to consider noise. Approach: Individual free fitting parameters are added for signals acquired following the two refocusing pulses, and different fitting models are compared: NLSQ, offset-noise model and Rician distributions of first and second order. Results: Correction parameters significantly improve the resulting T2 and T2* distributions. Offset-model fitting underestimates relaxation times, while Rician models improve the fit precision and significantly reduce residuums. Impact: Individual free pulse correction parameters for subsequent refocusing pulses combined with noise consideration in the form of Rician model fitting significantly improve simultaneous T2 and T2* quantification based on GE-SE EPIK data in terms of better precision and reduced residuums.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Küppers et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: