Prospective study demonstrates that free-breathing imaging matches breath-hold techniques in quality, suggesting enhanced patient comfort.
Motivation: To address the challenges posed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for patients who are unable to hold their breath, efforts are being made to develop techniques that allow for free-breathing. Goal(s): Compare accuracy of free breathing(FB) motion-corrected (MC) cine and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences with breath-hold (BH) for cardiac function and fibrosis assessment. Approach: A prospective study was conducted involving 216 patients who underwent both FB and BH MRI sequences. Results: FB imaging showed comparable image quality, shorter scan times, and no significant differences in functional parameters when compared to BH imaging. Impact: FB MoCo CMR provides a time-efficient and patient-friendly alternative, enhancing accessibility and comfort for cardiac patients, particularly those experiencing respiratory challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: