Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals two distinct subtypes in major depressive disorder based on functional connectivity patterns, highlighting biological mechanisms.
Motivation: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is heterogeneous with underlying mechanisms insufficiently studied. Subtyping can help address this heterogeneity. Goal(s): To identify specific MDD subtypes and their representative brain regions (epicenters) based on brain functional connectivity (FC) alterations, and investigate their biological mechanisms. Approach: Consensus clustering was applied for subtyping MDD patients. A regression model and correlation analyses with genetic/neurotransmitter profiles were used to quantify FC alterations and explore underlying biological mechanisms, respectively. Results: Two stable subtypes emerged, exhibiting divergent overall FC patterns with shared and unique epicenters in crucial brain networks, along with shared and varied genetic and neurotransmitter associations. Impact: The present study suggested the presence of two distinct FC-based subtypes in MDD characterized by shared and different epicenters and biological basis, and enhanced the understanding of MDD heterogeneity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: