Empirical analysis reveals significant spatial disparities in earthquake risk in urban and semi-urban areas, suggesting a need for context-sensitive measures.
This study explores appropriate, territory-specific approaches to earthquake risk reduction in the urban, semi-urban, and rural settings of Nepal's Mid-Western Region. Using empirical data derived from perceptions, preparedness actions, institutional capacity, and governance systems; the analysis reveals significant spatial disparities in how communities experience and respond to earthquake risks. Semi-urban areas, in particular, emerge as a critical zone of vulnerability due to inadequate attention in disaster planning, weak governance capacity, and hybrid infrastructural challenges. The findings emphasize that risk reduction measures must be context-sensitive and aligned with local geographical, institutional, and social realities. The study concludes that strengthening territorial disaster resilience requires a nuanced, inclusive, and decentralized approach that integrates policy enforcement, technical support, and community participation across all settlement types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: