Experimental analysis compares mechanical properties and microstructure of Ti35421 alloy using laser directed energy deposition and rolling, highlighting different phase characteristics.
In this study, the newly developed Ti35421 (Ti3Al5Mo4Cr2Zr1Fe wt.%) alloy was prepared by laser directed energy deposition (L-DED) because it contains several major elements that can refine grains, which is expected to enable the transformation from columnar to equiaxed grains. The results show that the L-DED Ti35421 alloy is predominantly composed of equiaxed grains and features various α-phase morphologies, including grain boundary α, lath α, and acicular α′ structures. These microstructural features are attributed to the rapid cooling conditions during processing. Such a microstructure enhances the alloy’s tensile strength (1446 MPa) while leading to limited ductility (1.7%). Following the solution and aging treatment, the grain boundary α phase undergoes coarsening, while the matrix β phase transforms into numerous fine lamellar α phases. This leads to a reduction in strength but an improvement in ductility. Therefore, the optimal heat treatment process for the L-DED Ti35421 alloy is determined to be a two-stage procedure: first, heating at 780 °C for 2 h followed by air cooling, and subsequently heating at 575 °C for 8 h with air cooling. Under this treatment, the alloy exhibits excellent mechanical properties, including a tensile strength of 1196 MPa, a yield strength of 1162 MPa, an elongation of 6.8%, and a reduction in area of 16.7%. Since there are no continuous grain boundaries in α, the rolled Ti35421 alloy exhibits better ductility than the L-DED Ti35421 alloy. This article is a revised and expanded version of a poster presentation entitled “Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-3Al-5Mo-4Cr-2Zr-1Fe alloy fabricated by laser deposition manufacturing”, which was accepted and presented at the 15th World Conference on Titanium (Ti-2023), Edinburgh, UK, 12–16 June 2023.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: