What type of study is this?

This is a Systematic Review study (also classified as: Meta-Analysis).

September 20, 2025Frontiers in RadiologyOpen Access

Predictors of acute adverse reactions to non-ionic iodinated contrast media in CT imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Acute adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media are influenced by various clinical and demographic factors, indicating a need for targeted interventions.
Meta-analysis of 17 studies revealed a mean incidence of 0.45% for acute adverse reactions following contrast-enhanced CT examinations.
The systematic review utilized a comprehensive search across multiple databases to identify and analyze relevant studies on risk factors.
Healthcare professionals should assess individual patient risk factors dynamically to implement effective preventive measures.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Systematic review and meta-analysis identifies key risk factors for iodinated contrast media adverse reactions in patients, suggesting improved assessment by healthcare professionals.

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46abb31b076d99fa67d82 https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2025.1656949

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Systematic review and meta-analysis identifies key risk factors for iodinated contrast media adverse reactions in patients, suggesting improved assessment by healthcare professionals.

Predictors of acute adverse reactions to non-ionic iodinated contrast media in CT imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Predictors of acute adverse reactions to non-ionic iodinated contrast media in CT imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider