Key result
Prior iodinated contrast exposure linked to ~517% greater risk of hypersensitivity reactions.
Why the study?
To assess the prevalence, severity profiles, and risk factors of hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media in a nationwide cohort, and evaluate the association between iodine concentration and hypersensitivity reaction risk.
What are the prevalence, risk factors, and effects of iodine concentration on hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving iodinated contrast media?
Cohort (n=115,966)
Yes
What are the prevalence, risk factors, and effects of iodine concentration on hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving iodinated contrast media?
Hazard Ratio: 6.168 (95% CI 4.896–7.77)
Hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media are rare (0.58%) and mostly mild, but risk is significantly elevated in patients with prior reactions, prior exposure, asthma, and when using higher iodine concentrations.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence, severity profiles, and risk factors of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to iodinated contrast media (ICM) in a nationwide cohort, and to evaluate the association between iodine concentration and HSR risk, including outcomes in patients receiving premedication, in the context of evolving contrast safety guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Korean National Health Insurance Service data from 2016 to 2018. Among 577,115 eligible individuals, 115,966 received ICM. HSRs within 7 days after ICM administration were identified using ICD-10-CM codes and classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on treatment intensity and hospitalization status. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and 3:1 propensity score matching were used to identify independent risk factors. Subgroup analyses were performed in 45,885 patients who received corticosteroid and/or antihistamine premedication. Additional analyses stratified by iodine concentration (≤300 vs. >300 mg I/mL; ≤350 vs. >350 mg I/mL) were performed in the full cohort. RESULTS: HSRs occurred in 667 of 115,966 patients (0.58%); 72.4% were mild, 17.1% moderate, and 10.5% severe (severe, 0.06% of all ICM users). Independent risk factors included prior ICM exposure [hazard ratio (HR): 6.168; 95% CI: 4.896, 7.770], prior HSR (HR: 16.675; 95% CI: 3.689, 75.382), asthma (HR: 1.732), allergy (HR: 1.82), and malignancy (HR: 1.804). In the premedication subgroup, prior ICM exposure (HR: 8.362), asthma (HR: 2.03), diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.911), and autoimmune disease (HR: 1.836) were significant predictors. Higher iodine concentrations were associated with modestly higher overall HSR prevalence [eg, 0.64% (>300 mg I/mL) vs. 0.50% (≤300 mg I/mL); P=0.001, and 0.63% (>350 mg I/mL) vs. 0.53% (≤350 mg I/mL); P=0.046], mainly due to increased mild‑to‑moderate reactions, while severe reactions remained stable at 0.06%. CONCLUSIONS: ICM-related HSRs were uncommon and usually mild, and severe reactions were rare in this nationwide cohort. Prior ICM exposure, prior HSR, asthma, allergy, and malignancy were key risk factors for HSRs. Prior ICM exposure, asthma, diabetes mellitus, and autoimmune disease further characterized high-risk patients receiving premedication. Higher iodine concentrations were associated with a modestly higher frequency of mild-to-moderate HSRs, without affecting severe reaction rates. These findings suggest that iodine concentration may represent a potentially modifiable factor in individualized contrast agent selection for high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (n=115,966). Prior iodinated contrast media (ICM) exposure vs. No prior ICM exposure was evaluated on Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) within 7 days (HR 6.168, 95% CI 4.896-7.770). Prior iodinated contrast media exposure strongly predicted hypersensitivity reactions (HR 6.168; 95% CI 4.896-7.770), and >300 mg I/mL iodine increased HSR prevalence (0.64% vs 0.50%; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: