Experimental analysis reveals contrasting SHG responses in two metal thiocyanates, indicating structural influences.
Colorless crystals of Cd(SCN)2(l-C5H9NO2)2 (1) and Zn(SCN)2(l-C5H9NO2)2 (2) were obtained by a solvent evaporation method. Compound 1 has a chainlike structure crystallized in the polar space group P21, while compound 2 features a monomeric structure crystallized in the polar space group C2. The second harmonic generation (SHG) responses of the two metal thiocyanates are 0.5 and 3.1 times that of KH2PO4, respectively. Theoretical calculation results reveal that the strong SHG response of compound 2 stems from the cooperative effect between the linear thiocyanate groups and terminal l-proline ligands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: