Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis concludes that Quetico-Superior project should be dropped, highlighting need for wilderness area preservation.
After reviewing the history of the Quetico-Superior project, the author comes to the conclusions (1) that the greater project embracing some 10 million acres in Minnesota and Ontario should be dropped, and (2) that interested organizations and individuals should concentrate their efforts on obtaining federal appropriations for the preservation of the roadless wilderness area in the Superior National Forest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
H. H. Chapman (1945) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: