Descriptive survey explores information seeking and resource preferences of LIS scholars, revealing reliance on digital resources.
This study explores the information-seeking behaviour of Ph.D. scholars in Library and Information Science (LIS) at Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University (RTMNU) during 2013–2018. Using a descriptive survey method, 52 valid responses (86.6%) were analyzed through a structured questionnaire and interviews. The results show that thesis or dissertation writing (88%) and publishing research papers (74%) were the main purposes for seeking information. Digital resources dominated, with daily use of websites (55%) and e-journals (43%). Overall, websites (90%) and e-journals (85%) were the most used, while print journals (46%) were less preferred. Scholars preferred print for books (62%) but digital for journals (72%) and theses/reports (65%). Major challenges included poor internet speed (54%), difficulty in evaluating online information (47%), and lack of awareness of e-resources (41%). Library services such as access to e-resources (72%) and reference services (58%) were frequently used. Satisfaction levels showed 44% satisfied and 21% very satisfied, while 15% expressed dissatisfaction. Suggestions highlighted remote access to e-resources (71%), better ICT infrastructure (63%), and training workshops (55%). The study concludes that LIS scholars rely heavily on digital resources alongside print. Strengthening ICT, awareness, and training can further enhance research productivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Najim Hussain Ahmad Sheikh (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: