This review compares circuit techniques for bidirectional protection switches, highlighting overcurrent protection and high-voltage capability.
Protecting sensitive electronic interfaces is critical in industrial applications, where exposure to harsh conditions and fault events is common. This paper reviews and compares circuit techniques for the design of bidirectional protection switches, highlighting key features such as analog switching, high-voltage capability, thermal shutdown, galvanic input isolation, and adjustable current limiting. Based on this review, we propose a universal architecture that combines the most suitable building blocks identified in the literature, with a focus on options that would enable monolithic integration in high-voltage silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology and capable of delivering up to 2 A at a maximum voltage of 200 V. The proposed architecture is intended as a design guide for realizing a universal switch, rather than a fabricated implementation. To demonstrate system-level interactions, behavioral MATLAB/Simulink (R2024b) simulations are presented using generic components, which show expected functional responses but are not tied to process-specific device models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pabot et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: