Mixed study establishes optimal confirmation threshold for hepatitis B surface antigen testing, suggesting cost reduction and improved accuracy.
Objective: To establish an optimal confirmation zone for initial hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) results obtained via Chemiluminescence Microparticle Immunoassay (CMIA) on the Architect i1000SR platform, aiming to enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary confirmatory testing and associated costs. Methods: A retrospective-prospective mixed study was conducted on 231 serum samples analysed at the Centre Pasteur of Cameroon between April 2018 and December 2019. Initial results obtained using the Architect HBsAg Qualitative II assay were confirmed through the Architect HBsAg Confirmatory test. Samples encompassed a broad range of signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratios (0.9 –> 500). Confirmation rates were analysed across intervals. Fisher’s exact test with Bonferroni correction was applied to assess statistical differences. Results: Of the 231 samples meeting inclusion criteria, 172 (74.5%; 95% CI: 68.3–79.9) were confirmed reactive, representing 74.8% of initially reactive samples (172/230). Confirmation rates were lowest in the 1.00–1.10 interval (9.1%) and the 1.10–10.00 interval (48.8%), both significantly lower than for samples above 200 S/CO (p < 0.0001). All samples above 200 S/CO were confirmed positive. The highest unconfirmed S/CO value observed was 170.01, supporting the effectiveness of the defined confirmation range (S/CO 0.90–200). Conclusion: The optimal confirmation zone was defined as 0.90–200 S/CO. Confirmatory testing below this threshold is essential, while values >200 can be considered definitively positive. Implementing this strategy can reduce costs, streamline workflow and turnaround times especially in resource-limited settings without compromising accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: