Abstract The CLIA automated Abbott-Architect HBsAg screening assay is globally recognized for its superior sensitivity but notably low specificity. This mandates positive results confirmation by another confirmatory assay, such as the widely used Abbott-Architect HBsAg neutralizing assay. Aim: To evaluate performance of the new CLIA Mindray-CL-900i HBsAg screening assay compared to Architect neutralizing/confirmatory assays. Methods: 200 archived HBsAg positive and negative samples by Architect screening were selected for this study. These samples were classified as follows: T.P. (n=39): positive by both Architect screening and confirmatory assays; T.N. (n=144): negative by both Architect screening and confirmatory assays; F.P. (n=17): positive by Architect screening but negative by confirmatory assay. All samples were retested using Mindray-CL-900i HBsAg screening assay. Results: Compared to Architect confirmatory assays, Mindray HBsAg CL-900i demonstrated perfect agreement with the confirmatory assay, as indicated by a Cohen's Kappa value of 0.98 (0.95 - 0.10). Mindray-CL-900i exhibited a sensitivity of 97%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 99%. The specificity was 100%, as none of the T.N. and F.P. results were identified as positive. Conclusion: Mindray-CL-900i could offer a cost-effective alternative for HBsAg screening, boasting perfect specificity and overcoming the limitations of current automated assays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasrallah et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: