Analysis of corruption cases in connectivity courts highlights procedural challenges and joint responsibilities.
Corruption can be committed by any member of society. It is possible that it is committed by members of the TNI together with civilians, who formally must be tried legally in a connectivity court. Based on this, the problem in this thesis is how to regulate the law on the settlement of corruption through connectivity courts, how is the mechanism for handling connectivity cases in corruption cases, what are the obstacles to resolving corruption through connectivity courts. The obstacle to resolving corruption crimes through connectivity trials is the procedure which is too complicated and long because the formation of the connection case investigation team is formed based on a joint decree between the TNI Commander and the Supreme Court. In addition, the Supreme Court and the Minister of Defense must also reciprocally propose the appointment of member judges who will handle connectivity cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: