Assessment of legal regulations addressing corruption in connectivity courts, suggesting needed reforms.
Corruption can be committed by any member of society. It is possible that it was committed by members of the TNI together with civilians, who formally must be tried legally in a connectivity court. Based on this, the problem in this thesis is how the legal regulations for resolving corruption crimes through connectivity courts, how the mechanism for handling connectivity cases in corruption cases, what are the obstacles to resolving corruption crimes through connectivity courts. Connectivity cases are good for general crimes and special crimes (corruption). The legal basis for criminal justice is regulated in Article 89 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 198 of Law Number 31 of 1997 concerning Military Justice and Article 16 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. And with the enactment of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, an implementing regulation concerning Article 16 is needed, so that there is uniformity in the provisions of the articles concerning criminal justice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuridiansyah et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: