Corruption crimes are not only carried out by civilians, but also occur in the military, namely the TNI (Indonesian National Army). In this situation, the civil society in question is all people, both those who work in the government and those who receive wages from the state. It is said that the TNI can commit corruption because the TNI is one of the subjects of the Corruption Eradication Law. The reason reformulation efforts are needed to regulate connectivity in cases of criminal acts of corruption is that there is a specificity given because the criminal act is different from other criminal acts in general. In terms of crime, eradicating corruption must be carried out in extraordinary ways. The ideal formulation for regulating connectivity in the case of criminal acts of corruption is that the connectivity mechanism as regulated in statutory regulations is felt to have several shortcomings, including requiring a long time, so it is felt that it ignores the principles of simple, fast and low-cost justice. So in this case the investigator prefers a split examination even though the connectivity mechanism is a mechanism that can make the case handling process into a complete series of connectivity examinations that can achieve justice for perpetrators from different jurisdictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wirayanu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: