This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Abstract Purpose: Although CD19 CAR-T cell therapy has shown remarkable success in B cell malignancies, a substantial fraction of patients does not obtain a long-term clinical response. This could be influenced by the quality of the individual CAR-T infusion product. To shed some light on this, clinical outcome was correlated to characteristics of CAR-T cell infusion products. Patients and Methods: In this phase II study patients with B cell lymphoma (n=23) or leukemia (n=1) received one or two infusions of third generation CD19-directed CAR-T cells (2x108/m2). The clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03068416. We investigated the transcriptional profile of individual third generation CD19 CAR-T infusion products using targeted single-cell RNA sequencing and multicolor flow cytometry. Results: Two CAR-T infusions were not better than one in the settings used in this study. As for the CAR-T infusion products we found that effector-like CD8+CAR-T cells with a high polyfunctionality, high cytotoxic and cytokine production profile and low dysfunctional signature was associated with clinical response. An extended ex vivo expansion time during CAR-T manufacturing negatively influenced the proportion of effector CD8+CAR-T cell in the infusion product. Conclusions: We identified cell-intrinsic characteristics of effector CD8+CAR-Ts correlating with response that could be used as an indicator for clinical outcome. The results in the study also serves as a guide to CAR-T manufacturing practices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarén et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: