Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective Despite the prevalent use of the general linear model (GLM) in fMRI data analysis, assuming a pre-defined hemodynamic response function (HRF) for all voxels can lead to reduced reliability and may distort the inferences derived from it. To overcome the necessity of presuming a specific model for the hemodynamic response, we introduce a semi-supervised automatic detection (SAD) method. Materials and methods The proposed SAD method employs a Bi-LSTM neural network to classify high temporal resolution fMRI data. Network training utilized an fMRI dataset with 75-ms temporal resolution in an iterative scheme. Classification performance was evaluated on a second fMRI dataset from the same participant, collected on a different day. Comparative analysis with the standard GLM approach was conducted to evaluate the cooperative effectiveness of the SAD method. Results The SAD method performed well based on the classification scores: true-positive rate = 0.961, area under the receiver operating curve = 0.998, true-negative rate = 0.99, F1-score = 0.979, False-negative rate = 0.038, false-discovery rate = 0.002, false-positive rate = 0.002 at 75-ms temporal resolution. Conclusion SAD can detect hemodynamic responses at 75-ms temporal resolution without relying on a specific shape of an HRF. Future work could expand the use cases to include more participants and different fMRI paradigms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: