nANGPTL4 suppresses ccRCC colony formation. A, MTS assay of the indicated CAKi-1 cells. Graph depicts the average absorbance ± SD. Two-way ANOVA was done to determine significance (n = 6 all groups). B, The indicated 786O cells were incubated with CSFE and analyzed by flow cytometry. The graph depicts the average % proliferation of the cells ± SD. Welch’s t test was done to determine significance. C, Soft agar colony assay. The indicated CAKi-1 cells were cultured on soft agar for 30 days and the number of colonies per well was counted. Left: representative images of colonies from the indicated cells (10× magnification). Right: graph depicts the average number of colonies ± SD. Welch’s t test was used to determine significance. D, The indicated RCC4 cell line was incubated in nonadherent conditions for 72 hours. The graph depicts the average number of colonies/well ± SD. Welch’s t test was done to determine significance. E, Graph depicts the average number of colonies/well of the indicated CAKi-1 cells treated as indicated with rat IgG or anti-cANGPTL4 ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test to correct for multiple comparisons was done to determine significance. F, Graph depicts the average number of colonies per well ± SD. of CAKi-1 A4 KO cells transfected with full length (FL), N-terminus or mock transfected as indicated. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test to correct for multiple comparisons was done to determine significance. G, Graph depicts the average number of colonies/well of the indicated 786O cells ± SD. Welch’s t test was done to determine significance. H, Graph depicts the average number of colonies/well ± SD of 786O A4 KO cells transfected with N-terminus or mock transfected as indicated. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test to correct for multiple comparisons was done to determine significance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: