The potential of making noodles using cocoyam flour was investigated. Cocoyam (Taro) and wheat flour were prepared. The proximate compositions of 100% cocoyam (C) flour, 100% wheat (W) flour, 50:50, and 70:30 blends of cocoyam-wheat (CW) flour were determined. Noodles were produced from cocoyam and wheat flour and their blends. The mean proximate composition of 100% cocoyam flour was found to be 11.19% amylose content, 8.70% crude protein, 4.86% ash, 0.60% fat content, 5.06% moisture content (wb), 6.38% crude fiber, and 72.22% carbohydrates with a swelling volume of 17.45 mL/g. The mean textural quality characteristics of the 100% cocoyam flour noodles were 5.88% cooking loss, 9.18 N/m2 tensile strength, 39.75 Pa elasticity, and 74.06 mm firmness with a cooking time of 4.31 mins. The 100% cocoyam noodles were rated 5.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 4.0 for appearance, flavor, hardness, texture, and overall acceptability, respectively on a 9- point hedonic scale. In comparison with 100% wheat flour noodles with an acceptability of 7.0, the 100% cocoyam noodles had a lower score. The 50:50 cocoyam-wheat flour blend noodles, however, scored 6.0 on acceptability which was very close to that of 100% wheat noodles. This study showed that though noodles could be made from 100% cocoyam flour, a 50:50 cocoyam-wheat flour blend would make better quality noodles in terms of nutrition and overall acceptability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asoiro et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: