We investigate a long-overlooked <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>C</a:mi><a:mi>P</a:mi></a:math> violation effect—the double-mixing <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>C</c:mi><c:mi>P</c:mi></c:math> asymmetry—in a type of cascade decay that involves at least two mixing neutral mesons in the decay chain. It is induced by the interference between different oscillation paths of the neutral mesons in the decay process. The double-mixing <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>C</e:mi><e:mi>P</e:mi></e:math> asymmetry is of critical importance for phenomenology, providing opportunities for clean determination of Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa phase angles free of uncertainties induced by the strong dynamics. To illustrate this point, we perform a phenomenological analysis on two examples: <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><g:msubsup><g:mi>B</g:mi><g:mi>s</g:mi><g:mn>0</g:mn></g:msubsup><g:mo stretchy="false">→</g:mo><g:msup><g:mi>ρ</g:mi><g:mn>0</g:mn></g:msup><g:mi>K</g:mi><g:mo stretchy="false">→</g:mo><g:msup><g:mi>ρ</g:mi><g:mn>0</g:mn></g:msup><g:mo stretchy="false">(</g:mo><g:msup><g:mi>π</g:mi><g:mo>−</g:mo></g:msup><g:msup><g:mo>ℓ</g:mo><g:mo>+</g:mo></g:msup><g:msub><g:mi>ν</g:mi><g:mo>ℓ</g:mo></g:msub><g:mo stretchy="false">)</g:mo></g:math> and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msup><m:mi>B</m:mi><m:mn>0</m:mn></m:msup><m:mo stretchy="false">→</m:mo><m:msup><m:mi>D</m:mi><m:mn>0</m:mn></m:msup><m:mi>K</m:mi><m:mo stretchy="false">→</m:mo><m:msup><m:mi>D</m:mi><m:mn>0</m:mn></m:msup><m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo><m:msup><m:mi>π</m:mi><m:mo>+</m:mo></m:msup><m:msup><m:mo>ℓ</m:mo><m:mo>−</m:mo></m:msup><m:msub><m:mover accent="true"><m:mi>ν</m:mi><m:mo stretchy="false">¯</m:mo></m:mover><m:mo>ℓ</m:mo></m:msub><m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo></m:math>. Our results demonstrate that the double-mixing <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mi>C</u:mi><u:mi>P</u:mi></u:math> asymmetry can be numerically significant in the absence of strong phases, as shown by the former example. Additionally, the latter example showcases a direct extraction of weak and strong phases from data, without the need for theoretical inputs. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: