Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 20, 2024Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Selection tests work better than we think they do, and have for years

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JFJeff L. FosterPSPiers SteelPHP. D. Harms

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Foster et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b8a1b6db64358755113fhttps://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.10
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hiring People in Organizations: The State and Future of the Science2025 · 7 citations
  2. 2The need for “Considered Estimation” versus “Conservative Estimation” when ranking or comparing predictors of job performance2024 · 8 citations
  3. 3RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS2007 · 650 citations
  4. 4Same as it ever was: A clarification on the sources of predictable variance in job performance ratings2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Personnel Selection2007 · 281 citations