BACKGROUND Obesity remains a critical global public health issue, contributing to severe health conditions such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. In Maidstone, United Kingdom the obesity rate stands at 16.3% higher than the national average of 15.8%. OBJECTIVE This study evaluates the demographics and outcomes of a face-to-face weight management program implemented in Maidstone, a region with varying levels of deprivation, who self-referred to a Tier 2 Weight Management program. METHODS This study employed a single-arm intervention design, where adults who were overweight or obese self-referred to an in-person weight management service. The service focuses on accessible behavior change self-management through weekly evidence-based structured education, guided behavioral change activities, and community support. Participant characteristics and health data were collected at baseline, 12 and 26-weeks. RESULTS A total of 50 participants self-referred and completed the initial registration process, all of whom (100%) were deemed eligible for the program. The first 40 participants (80%) enrolled in the face-to-face weight management service, and of these, 15 (38%) also downloaded an app for additional support. The average age of participants was 42.4 years, with mean BMI of 35.7 kg/m², predominantly female (68%) and 73% identified as white. At the 26-week follow-up, 75% of participants reported outcomes, with an average weight loss of 3.46% ± 4.2% (from 98.3 ± 23.0 kg at Week 0 to 94.9 ± 21.7 kg at Week 26) and an average BMI reduction of 3.34% ± 3.9 kg/m² (from 35.7 ± 8.7 kg/m² at Week 0 to 34.5 ± 8.3 kg/m² at Week 26). Participants expressed high levels of engagement and acceptance of the service, and those who utilized the digital app experienced greater weight loss. CONCLUSIONS The face-to-face service was well-received and facilitated significant weight loss. Integration of digital technology contributed to greater weight reduction among participants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Summers et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: