Key result
Second Nature's digital weight management intervention is linked to ~12% weight loss at two years.
Why the study?
Limited real-world evidence and long-term outcome data exist regarding the effectiveness of digital weight management interventions to support specialist weight management services in the NHS.
Does a 12-month digital weight management intervention improve sustained weight loss at 2 years in adults with obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m²) with or without type 2 diabetes?
Observational (n=1,130)
Yes
Does a 12-month digital weight management intervention improve sustained weight loss at 2 years in adults with obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m²) with or without type 2 diabetes?
p-value: p=<0.001
A 12-month digital weight management program was associated with significant and sustained weight loss at 2 years in adults with severe obesity, though only a minority of participants had recorded weights at follow-up.
May support digital programs for sustained loss in severe obesity; leaves open durability and generalizability given high attrition.
BACKGROUND Digital weight management interventions (DWMIs) have the potential to support existing specialist weight management services (SWMS) in the National Health Service (NHS) to increase access to treatment for people living with obesity and type 2 diabetes. At present, there is limited real-world evidence and long-term outcomes on the potential effectiveness of DWMIs to support such services. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine real-world data to evaluate the impact of Second Nature’s 12-month DWMI for patients living with obesity with or without type 2 diabetes, referred from NHS primary care services, on sustained weight loss over a 2-year period. METHODS Retrospective data were extracted in August 2023 for participants who participated in the program between January 1, 2017, and January 8, 2021. Eligible participants were adults with a BMI ≥35 kg/m², with or without type 2 diabetes. The primary outcomes were weight change in kilograms and percentage weight change at 2 years. Secondary outcomes were weight loss at 1 year, program engagement, and the proportion of participants who achieved >5% and >10% weight loss. Differences in weight loss between baseline and the 1- and 2-year follow-up points were compared using paired 2-tailed t tests. Linear regression models were used to examine whether participants’ ethnicity, indices of multiple deprivation, presence of type 2 diabetes, or program engagement were associated with weight loss at 1 year or 2 years. RESULTS A total of 1130 participants with a mean baseline BMI of 46.3 (SD 31.6) kg/m² were included in the analysis. Of these participants, 65% (740/1130) were female (mean age 49.9, SD 12.0 years), 18.1% (205/339) were from Black, Asian, mixed, or other ethnicities, and 78.2% (884/1130) had type 2 diabetes. A total of 281 (24.9%) participants recorded weight readings at 2 years from baseline, with a mean weight loss of 13.8 kg (SD 14.2 kg; P<.001) or 11.8% (SD 10.9%; P<.001). A total of 204 (18.1%) participants achieved ≥5% weight loss, and 130 (11.5%) participants reached ≥10% weight loss. Weight loss did not significantly differ by ethnicity, indices of multiple deprivation, presence of type 2 diabetes, or engagement in the program. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggested that Second Nature’s DWMI has the potential to support people living with obesity and type 2 diabetes remotely to achieve clinically significant and sustained weight loss at 2 years from baseline. Further research is needed to compare the intervention to standard care and assess integration with multidisciplinary clinical teams and pharmacotherapy in order to support this study’s findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richards et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Obesity with or without type 2 diabetes (n=1,130). Second Nature's 12-month digital weight management intervention was evaluated on weight change in kilograms and percentage weight change at 2 years (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: