Analysis predicts peri-operative risk associated with circumflex artery anatomy in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery.
OBJECTIVES Iatrogenic injury to the circumflex artery during mitral valve surgery occurs in 0.3–1.8% of cases. This study analyzed the circumflex artery’s anatomical relationship to the mitral annulus using advanced imaging to predict peri-operative risk in patients undergoing endoscopic mitral valve surgery. METHODS A computed tomography (CT) analysis using 3mensio software was performed in 315 patients (2019–2023) undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. A prediction index for circumflex artery injury was calculated to identify at-risk individuals. RESULTS Circumflex artery anatomy was assessable in all patients (n = 315). The mean age was 62.84 ± 11.34 years; median annulus area was 12.97 ± 5.69 cm2. The mean distance between the left circumflex artery and mitral annulus was 6.97 ± 3.85 mm. A critical distance < 4 mm was observed in 23.5% (74/315), among whom circumflex obstruction occurred in 2.71% (2/74), compared to 0% in those with ≥ 4 mm distance (p = 0.05). Percutaneous coronary intervention was required in 0.32% (1/315). A low injury prediction index (≤ 0.2) was found in 27.31% (86/315), correlating with male sex, larger annular dimensions, and elevated injury risk. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative CT-based measurement of the circumflex artery’s distance from the mitral annulus is feasible and may identify patients at elevated risk for iatrogenic injury. A distance ≤ 4 mm or injury prediction index ≤ 0.2 indicates increased risk. Routine CT imaging, combined with coronary angiography, is recommended for risk stratification before mitral valve surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kruse et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: