Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Countries reap numerous benefits from maintaining rural communities. Those advantages, however, come at a cost. We examine the additional costs of public services in rural areas in Israel by considering sparsity, population size and density, distances, and socio-economic status of rural residents. We quantify the effect of these factors and find that the cost of providing public services in rural areas is 39% greater than in cities. Density and other structural differences contribute 20% to the added cost. Economies of scale contribute 8.2%; peripheral location 4.2%; and socio-economic status 2.6%. We show that population density moderates the relation between population size and per-resident expenditure. We also demonstrate that more rural villages in an area increases per-resident expenditure and moderates the relation between distance and expenditure. We discuss policy implications and suggest contributions to a deeper understanding of the rural public economy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: